Law School Personal Statement Examples & Tutoring

Law School Personal Statement Examples

Here are six example law school personal statements, each followed by a short note on what it does well.

We wrote these six ourselves as teaching models. The applicants are invented, the programs are left generic on purpose, and nothing here is a real client's statement. Read them for structure and for how specific the detail gets, not as text to borrow.

Example 1 - The Leasing Office

For three years I worked the front desk of a 212-unit apartment complex, and part of my job was taping notices to doors.

Most were routine, like pool hours or pest control dates. About twice a month I also posted three-day notices to pay or quit. The regional office emailed me a list of unpaid balances on the fifth, I filled in the forms, and I walked the property with a roll of tape and a clipboard. I photographed each notice on its door because the company’s attorney wanted a record of service.

I didn’t think much about what came after until a tenant I’ll call Mr. Okafor came into the office holding his notice. He had paid. He had a money order receipt for the full rent, dated the second of the month. Our system showed him $1,140 short because the payment had been entered under the wrong unit, one digit off. I found the error in about ten minutes, fixed it and apologized. Then he asked me what would have happened if he had thrown the receipt away. I told him I didn’t know, which was true, and it bothered me for weeks.

Our eviction cases went to an outside firm, and when the files came back I started reading them before I put them away. I learned that an unlawful detainer case moves quickly, that a tenant who doesn’t file a response in time can lose by default, and that in most of our files the tenant had never filed anything. Some of those tenants owed the money. Some, I suspect, were Mr. Okafor without the receipt.

I want to be fair to my employer. The managers I worked for were not cruel, and an owner who goes months without rent can lose a building. But the process was lopsided in a way anyone at our counter could see. The company had a lawyer on retainer and a template for every step. Most tenants had a piece of paper on their door and the address of a courthouse they had never been inside.

In my second year I asked to take over the delinquency report, and I started calling tenants before a notice went out instead of after. It wasn’t company policy, and at first my manager only tolerated it. By my last year our eviction filings had dropped from about four a month to about one, mostly because tenants who were two weeks behind could set up a payment date before anything was taped to a door. The regional office later added the calls to the procedures at two other properties.

For the past year I have also volunteered on Saturday mornings at a tenant clinic run by a legal aid organization, helping people fill out answer forms under a staff attorney’s supervision. Knowing the landlord’s side of the paperwork turns out to be useful when the person across the table is holding a summons. What I can’t do is tell them whether they have a defense. The attorney does that, and I go back to the intake stack.

I want to practice housing law and represent tenants in eviction cases. I think I will be better at it for having spent three years on the other side of the counter, entering the payments and printing the notices myself.

What works here: The first sentence gives the job and the uncomfortable part of it (“taping notices to doors”) before any talk of justice, so the reader knows exactly where this applicant stood in the process. The money order “entered under the wrong unit, one digit off” is one small, checkable error with a dollar amount attached. A weaker draft would say “I saw how unfairly tenants were treated” and leave the reader to supply the example. “I want to be fair to my employer” shows judgment: she gives the owner’s side before she names the imbalance. Someone who will argue one side for a living needs to show she can see the other one. The phone calls and the drop “from about four a month to about one” show her changing something with the little authority she had. That is better evidence of initiative than a list of traits. The ending names a practice area and a client group, and the last clause (“printing the notices myself”) ties the goal back to the job in the first sentence without restating the essay.

Example 2 - The Unpaid Electrician

The check bounced on a Friday.

I had spent six weeks pulling wire through three floors of a medical office building in Escondido. There were four of us on the crew. The general contractor owed our shop $38,000, and my share of the labor was most of what I had planned to live on through the winter. When the bank sent the check back, the contractor stopped answering his phone.

My boss wanted to let it go. Suing costs money, he said, and the guy would probably file for bankruptcy anyway. I didn't have a better answer. So on Saturday I drove to the county law library and asked the librarian where someone in my position should start. She pulled a binder off the shelf and said, "Read the part about mechanics' liens."

I had never heard the term. California lets anyone who improves a property put a claim against it if they go unpaid, but only if they follow the steps exactly: a preliminary notice within 20 days of starting work, and a recorded lien within 90 days of finishing. We had skipped the first step. Nobody at our shop knew it existed.

I kept reading anyway, because I wanted to understand exactly how we had lost. Two other subcontractors on that building got paid in full. Their work was no better than ours. They had mailed a one-page form during their first week on the job.

I thought about that for months. I had always thought of the law as something for people in suits. It turned out to be a set of deadlines, and the people who knew the deadlines kept their money.

Since then I have done the preliminary notices for our shop on every job, and a year later two other small contractors I know asked me to handle theirs. I helped a coworker prepare for small claims court when a homeowner refused to pay for a panel upgrade. He won. I took a paralegal certificate course at night, mostly to find out whether I liked the reading as much as I liked the wiring, and it turned out I did.

I want to practice construction law, and I want to practice it for the people at the bottom of the payment chain, the subcontractors and suppliers who find out about a deadline after it has passed. I have stood on a ladder waiting for a check that never came. I would like to spend my career making sure fewer people learn the rules the way I did.

What works here: “The check bounced on a Friday.” states the problem in six words, and the next paragraph backs it with numbers ($38,000, four on the crew, six weeks of wire), so the reader believes the stakes before the applicant says anything about the law. He explains the preliminary notice and lien deadlines in two plain sentences. That shows he can read a rule and explain it to someone who isn’t a lawyer, which is a large part of first-year legal writing. “Two other subcontractors on that building got paid in full” is left to make its own point. A weaker draft would follow it with a paragraph about injustice; this one moves straight to what he did next. The notices for his shop and two other contractors, the small claims help and the night paralegal course show an interest that lasted years, not one bad weekend. The last paragraph names a field (construction law) and a client group (“the people at the bottom of the payment chain”), both of which the story has already earned.

Example 3 - The Mock Trial Coach

For nine years I taught United States history to tenth graders at a public high school, and for six of those years I coached our mock trial team, which meant that most of my Saturdays between October and February were spent in borrowed courtrooms watching sixteen-year-olds argue over a fictional warehouse fire.

I took the coaching job because nobody else would. I knew nothing about the rules of evidence when I started; I learned them the way my students did, one objection at a time, usually after losing a round because we had not anticipated one. What surprised me was how much I came to enjoy them. The hearsay rule, which my students initially regarded as an arbitrary way of keeping good information out, became for us a long conversation about why a court should trust one kind of statement more than another, and about who gets to decide.

One student, whom I will call Daniela, barely spoke in class. She joined the team as a timekeeper. By her junior year she was our best cross-examiner, and I remember the afternoon she asked me why the excited-utterance exception existed at all, given that frightened people are not especially reliable. I did not have a good answer. I went home and read the advisory committee's notes, and then a law review article, and then another, and I realized that I had not read anything that carefully for my own pleasure since college.

At the same time, I was seeing a different side of the law at school. Several times a year I sat in on meetings about students with disabilities whose families disagreed with the district about what services they needed. The district always brought someone who knew the regulations thoroughly. The parents usually brought a folder of report cards and a great deal of worry. When a disagreement went to a due process hearing, the families who had an advocate tended to get what their child needed, and the families who did not tended to accept whatever was offered.

I do not blame the district staff, most of whom were doing their honest best under real constraints. I do think the imbalance was obvious to everyone in those rooms, and I was frequently the teacher in the corner who understood the child well and the procedure poorly.

I intend to practice education law, representing families in special education disputes. Teaching has given me patience with people who are frightened of a process, and some practice at explaining complicated rules plainly. I would like to bring both into the rooms where I used to sit quietly in the corner.

What works here: The long first sentence packs in nine years of teaching, six years of coaching and “a fictional warehouse fire,” so the reader knows who this applicant is and why he spent his Saturdays in courtrooms before the second paragraph. Daniela’s question about the excited-utterance exception, and his trip to the advisory committee’s notes and two law review articles, show curiosity through what he did that night. A weaker draft would just say “I developed a love of legal reasoning.” The special education meetings add a second, more serious reason for law, and “I do not blame the district staff” keeps that section from turning into a complaint about his employer. “understood the child well and the procedure poorly” names the exact gap law school would close, in his own terms. He treats the career change as preparation instead of apologizing for it: patience with frightened people and explaining rules plainly are both things an education lawyer does every week.

Example 4 - The Eleven-Line Bug

The bug was eleven lines long.

I found it in my second year as a software engineer at a company that builds benefits eligibility systems for state agencies. A caseworker had filed a ticket saying that applicants who were paid every two weeks were being denied food assistance at a higher rate than applicants paid twice a month. (The two sound the same. Biweekly pay produces 26 checks a year and semimonthly pay produces 24, so in two months of the year a biweekly worker receives three.)

The code was working exactly as written. When a household had a three-paycheck month, the system counted all three checks as ordinary monthly income, which pushed some families just over the limit. I assumed someone had made a mistake, so I went looking for the requirement document behind those eleven lines.

It took two weeks to find. The logic traced back to a contractor's interpretation, written years earlier, of a state policy manual that said income should be “converted to a monthly amount” without saying how. The federal rules allowed more than one method. Somebody had picked a method. There was no record of who, or of anyone reviewing the choice.

Fixing the code would have taken an afternoon. Deciding what the code should say took four months and a policy memo from the agency's general counsel. I sat in on most of those meetings, and I spent a good part of them realizing that the attorneys were doing the actual design work. They were deciding which of several defensible readings of the rules the agency would adopt, and the software would simply carry out whatever they chose, for about 400,000 households.

(I also learned that "shall" and "may" are the two most expensive words in government. I say that only half as a joke.)

I have spent five years building systems that make legal decisions at scale, usually without anyone calling them legal decisions. More and more of what government does now reaches people through software, and I think the lawyers who help shape it need to understand how a sentence in a regulation becomes a line of code, and where the ambiguity goes when it does.

I want to study administrative law, with a focus on how agencies use automated systems to decide who qualifies for benefits. After law school I hope to work in an agency counsel's office or at a legal aid organization that challenges those decisions. Either way, I expect to keep reading requirement documents that nobody else has opened in years. I've found I'm good at it.

What works here: The parenthetical on biweekly versus semimonthly pay (26 checks against 24) lets a reader with no coding background understand the bug in two sentences. A weaker draft would describe “a complex eligibility logic error” and lose that reader. “Fixing the code would have taken an afternoon. Deciding what the code should say took four months” is the turn of the essay. The reader watches him find out where the real decision was made. “the attorneys were doing the actual design work” shows he understands what agency lawyers do day to day, which is far more persuasive than saying he is interested in technology and law. The aside about “shall” and “may” gives the reader a bit of his personality in one line and then gets out of the way. The goals paragraph names a field (administrative law), a specific focus (automated benefits decisions) and two kinds of employers, so the reader can see the career he is describing.

Example 5 - The Self-Help Desk

"Are we here for the car?" my father asks.

We are sitting on a bench outside Department 3 of the probate court, and he has asked about the car four times since we parked. He sold it in 2019. I tell him we're here to talk to a judge about helping him with his bills, which is true, and he nods and looks at the elevator.

I had filed the conservatorship petition myself. My father's neurologist had diagnosed Alzheimer's two years earlier, and by that spring he had missed three mortgage payments and given a man on the phone his bank password. My brother lives in Ohio. There was nobody else, and I could not afford a lawyer after paying the deposit for his memory care.

The forms came from the court's self-help center. They ran to 60 pages, and I understood about half of them. I made mistakes. My first hearing was postponed because I had mailed notice to my brother one day too late, and I cried in the parking garage, and then I went back in and asked the woman at the self-help desk what I had done wrong.

Her name was Rosa, and she was an attorney. She gave me twenty minutes, which I later learned was all she was allowed to give anyone. She walked me through the notice rules on the back of a flyer. "You're doing fine," she said. "Most people give up at this part."

I didn't give up, and in August the judge appointed me. The court investigator who interviewed my father was kind to him. I thought the system had worked, mostly, for me. I also thought about the people who had been ahead of me in line at Rosa's desk that morning: a man who didn't speak much English, and an elderly couple who seemed to be filing to become each other's conservators. I don't know what happened to either of them.

I work as an office manager for a dental practice. I am good at deadlines, and at calming down people who are scared. For three years I have volunteered one evening a week at the self-help center, sorting paperwork and helping people find the right packet. I want to go to law school so that I can do what Rosa did, for longer than twenty minutes at a time, and I want to practice elder law.

Rosa still works at that desk on Tuesdays. I have asked her to write one of my letters.

What works here: The statement opens on her father asking about a car he sold in 2019. The reader understands his condition from that one question, so there is no need for a paragraph about the diagnosis. She admits a real mistake (the late notice), the reaction it caused, and what she did next: “I went back in and asked.” Admissions readers look for that sequence more than a flawless record. Rosa’s twenty-minute limit makes the case for more lawyers at that desk without the applicant arguing it. A weaker draft would add a sentence about the justice gap here. The man who didn’t speak much English and the elderly couple widen the story past her own family, which keeps it from being only about her hardship. Three years of weekly volunteering shows the interest outlasted the crisis, and the closing detail about the letter points forward instead of summing up.

Example 6 - The Courts Reporter

How long does it take to explain your side of the story?

At the county courthouse where I covered criminal court for four years, the answer on a busy arraignment morning was about ninety seconds. That was roughly how long a public defender had with each new client before the judge called the case. I timed it once, on my phone, for a story I never ended up writing.

I was a reporter for a small daily paper. The courts beat was supposed to be a stepping stone, and most people rotated off it within a year. I asked to stay. I liked the building. I liked that almost everything happened on the record, and that if you sat in the back row long enough you could watch the whole county pass through one room.

What I kept noticing was bail.

People charged with the same offense would walk out or stay in depending mostly on whether they could come up with a few thousand dollars that morning. Someone who stayed in for a week could lose a job, and then an apartment, before anyone had looked at the evidence. I wrote a three-part series on it. My editor cut it to one part. It ran on a Sunday, and the following Monday the calendar looked exactly the same.

I kept asking myself what the story had been for.

I don't think journalism failed there. I think I had reached the edge of what a reporter can do, which is describe a problem accurately and hand it to someone else. The public defenders I interviewed were the someone else. They were overworked and very funny, and they were the only people in that building who could stand up in the moment and say, "Your Honor, my client has a job and a daughter, and he'll be here."

I left the paper last year. Since then I have worked as an investigator for the public defender's office, tracking down witnesses and pulling records. It is the most useful I have ever felt. It is also frustrating to hand my notes to an attorney and then sit in the gallery again.

I want to be the one standing up. I want to be a public defender in a county like mine, where the calendar is long and the room is always full.

What works here: “About ninety seconds,” timed on her own phone, does the work of a paragraph about public defender caseloads, and the reader remembers the number. The bail paragraph moves through what she saw in order (job, then apartment, before anyone looked at the evidence), and the result of her series is one flat line: “the calendar looked exactly the same.” She explains why she is leaving journalism without dismissing it (“describe a problem accurately and hand it to someone else”). A weaker draft would complain about the media and make the reader wonder how she treats colleagues. The investigator job shows she has already tested the work up close, and “frustrating to hand my notes to an attorney” names the exact step she wants to take. The short last paragraph names the job and the kind of county she wants to do it in, which answers “why law” and “what kind of law” at once.

Video: 7 Ways to Write a Crappy Graduate School Personal Statement

For more personal statement tips, check out Vince's video: 7 Ways to Write a Crappy Graduate School Personal Statement.

BTW, Lauren can also help with:

• Dissertation and thesis editing
• Graduate school CV and resume examples
• Teaching statement examples
• Academic cover letter examples
• Diversity statement examples
• Research statement examples
• Biomedical Sciences personal statements
• Fellowships and Grants personal statements
• Master's degree personal statements
• MBA personal statements
• MS in Business Analytics personal statements
• PhD personal statements
• Post-doctoral personal statements
• Anesthesiologist Assistant personal statements
• Applied Behavior Analysis / BCBA personal statements
• Art Therapy personal statements
• Athletic Training personal statements
• Audiology personal statements
• Chiropractic personal statements
• Clinical Psychology PhD personal statements
• CRNA personal statements
• Dental school personal statements
• Diagnostic Medical Sonography personal statements
• Dietetics / Registered Dietitian personal statements
• Epidemiology personal statements
• Exercise Physiology personal statements
• Genetic Counseling personal statements
• Health Informatics personal statements
• Kinesiology / Human Performance personal statements
• Marriage and Family Therapy personal statements
• Master of Public Policy personal statements
• Medical Laboratory Science personal statements
• Medical Residency personal statements
• MHA personal statements
• MPH personal statements
• MS in Counseling personal statements
• Nurse Midwifery personal statements
• Nurse Practitioner personal statements
• Nursing school personal statements
• Occupational Therapy personal statements
• Optometry personal statements
• Orthotics and Prosthetics personal statements
• Perfusion Science personal statements
• PharmD personal statements
• Physical Therapy personal statements
• Physician Assistant personal statements
• Podiatry personal statements
• PsyD personal statements
• Radiation Therapy personal statements
• Respiratory Therapy personal statements
• Social Work personal statements
• Speech-Language Pathology personal statements
• Veterinary School personal statements

We've got San Diego offices in Sorrento Valley and Carmel Valley.